Kendala dan Kesiapan Lembaga Pemerintah Indonesia dalam Penerapan Akuntansi Agrikultur

Indiana Farid Martadi

Abstract


The aim of this research is to analyze about the constrains and readiness of Indonesian government organizations in implementing the PSAP – Agriculture (Draft). This research was conducted in two agencies in the Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries and two agencies in the Ministry of Agriculture. This study was using a qualitative methods by using initial questionnaire to obtain general description about accounting of biological assets and their agriculture products at the four working units as described. Advance confirmation and evidence collection was carried out remotely right after the answers of the initial questionare was received. The results of this study indicated that asset valuation is the biggest obstacle to the four agencies in implementing the PSAP - Agriculture (Draft), due to the absence of active market. Regulation about State’s Property was also a problem to those agencies in presenting biological assets according to PSAP - Agriculture (Draft).

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisa terhadap kendala dan kesiapan penerapan Draf PSAP – Agrikultur pada organisasi pemerintah di Indonesia. Penelitian ini dilakukan pada dua unit kerja di Kementerian Kelautan dan Perikanan serta dua unit kerja di Kementerian Pertanian. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif kualitatif dengan menggunakan kuesioner awal untuk mendapatkan gambaran umum terkait akuntansi aset biologis produk agrikulturnya pada keempat unit kerja. Konfirmasi lanjutan dan pengumpulan bukti-bukti dilakukan secara jarak jauh setelah jawaban atas kuesioner awal diterima. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa, penilaian aset merupakan kendala terbesar bagi keempat unit dalam penerapan draf PSAP – Agrikultur, karena tidak adanya pasar aktif. Peraturan terkait Barang Milik Negara juga menjadi kendala bagi keempat unit kerja tersebut dalam menyajikan aset biologis sesuai draf PSAP – Agrikultur.

Keywords


Standar Akuntansi;Organisasi Pemerintah;Aset Biologis;Kendala;Kesiapan

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adebayo, T. S., Akinsola, G. D., Kirikkaleli, D., Bekun, F. V., Umarbeyli, S., & Osemeahon, O. S. (2021). Economic performance of Indonesia amidst CO2 emissions and agriculture: a time series analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(35), 47942–47956. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13992-6

Arbidane, I., & Mietule, I. (2018). Problems and solutions of accounting and evaluation of biological assets in Latvia. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 6(1), 10–22. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2018.6.1(1)

Aryanto, Y. H. (2012). Theoretical Failure of IAS 41. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1808413

Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is Qualitative in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Sociology, 42(2), 139–160.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7

Awokuse, T. O., & Xie, R. (2015). Does agriculture really matter for economic growth in developing countries? Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 63(1), 77–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/cjag.12038

Baigrie, I., & Coetsee, D. (2016). An analysis of the financial reporting compliance of South African public agricultural companies. Journal of Economic and Financial Sciences, 9(3), 833–853. https://doi.org/10.4102/jef.v9i3.73

Biro Pusat Statistik (BPS). (2022). Berita Resmi Statistik Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Produk Domestik Bruto No. 14/02/Th. XXV, 7 Februari 2022. bps.go.id. https://www.bps.go.id/website/materi_ind/materiBrsInd-20220207114513.pdf

Bozzolan, S., Laghi, E., & Mattei, M. (2016). Amendments to the IAS 41 and IAS 16 – Implications for accounting of bearer plants. Agricultural Economics (Czech Republic), 62(4), 160–166. https://doi.org/10.17221/48/2015-AGRICECON

Daniels, E., Arden-Close, E., & Mayers, A. (2020). Be quiet and man up: A qualitative questionnaire study into fathers who witnessed their Partner’s birth trauma. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 20(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-02902-2

De Wolf, A., Christiaens, J., & Aversano, N. (2021). Heritage assets in the due process of the International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board (IPSASB). Public Money and Management, 41(4), 325–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2020.1727114

Dewan Standar Akuntansi Keuangan (DSAK). (2018). Pernyataan Standar Akuntansi 69 ― Agrikultur. https://sak.iaiglobal.or.id/

Elad, C., & Herbohn, K. (2011). Implementing fair value accounting in the agricultural sector. Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland.

Feleagă, L., Feleagă, N., & Răileanu, V. (2012). Theoretical considerations about implementation of IAS 41 in Romania. Theoretical and Applied Economics, XIX(2), 31–38.

Fogarty, S., & Ramjan, L. M. (2016). Factors impacting treatment and recovery in Anorexia Nervosa: Qualitative findings from an online questionnaire. Journal of Eating Disorders, 4(1), 1–9.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-016-0107-1

Hammarberg, K., Kirkman, M., & De Lacey, S. (2016). Qualitative research methods: When to use them and how to judge them. Human Reproduction, 31(3), 498–501. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev334

International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). (2000). International Accounting Standards No. 41 ― Agriculture. https://www.ifrs.org/issued-standards/list-of-standards/ias-41-agriculture.html/content/dam/ifrs/publications/html-standards/english/2022/issued/ias41/

International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board (IPSASB). (2003). International Public Sector Accounting Standards 27 ― Agriculture. https://www.ifac.org/system/files/publications/files/B3 IPSAS_27_0.pdf

Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia. (2016). Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 181/PMK.06/2016 tentang Penatausahaan Barang Milik Negara. https://jdih.kemenkeu.go.id/fulltext/2016/181~PMK.06~2016Per.pdf

Khan, T. (2014). Kalimantan’s biodiversity: Developing accounting models to prevent its economic destruction. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 27(1), 150–182. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-07-2013-1392

Komite Standar Akuntansi Pemerintah (KSAP). (2019). Standar Akuntansi Pemerintahan Berbasis Akrual Pernyataan No. XX ― Agrikultur (Draf). http://www.ksap.org/sap/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Draf-PSAP-Agrikultur-September-2019.pdf

Komite Standar Akuntansi Pemerintahan (KSAP). (2004). Pernyataan Standar Akuntansi Pemerintahan No. 05 ― Akuntansi Persediaan. http://www.ksap.org/draft/PSAP_05.pdf

Komite Standar Akuntansi Pemerintahan (KSAP). (2005). Standar Akuntansi Pemerintahan Pernyataan Nomor 7 ― Akuntansi Aset Tetap. http://www.ksap.org/standar/PSAP07.pdf

Komite Standar Akuntansi Pemerintahan (KSAP). (2014). Buletin Teknis Nomor 15 ― Akuntansi Aset Tetap Berbasis Akrual. http://www.ksap.org/sap/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Bultek-15-Aset-Tetap-Akrual-fin.pdf

Kurniawan, R., & Managi, S. (2018). Economic Growth and Sustainable Development in Indonesia: An Assessment. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 54(3), 339–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2018.1450962

Kurniawan, R., Mulawarman, A. D., & Kamayanti, A. (2014). Biological Assets Valuation Reconstruction: A Critical Study of IAS 41 on Agricultural Accounting in Indonesian Farmers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 164(August), 68–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.11.052

Kurniawati, D., & Falikhatun. (2019). Implementasi Pernyataan Standar Akuntansi Keuangan (PSAK) 69 Agrikultur pada Perum Perhutani Kesatuan Pemangku Hutan (KPH) Surakarta. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 19(2), 167–195. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.20961/jab.v19i2.449

Maina, P. N., & Wingard, H. C. (2013). Small and medium-sized entities in the agricultural sector: Fair value reporting challenges. Agrekon, 52(2), 52–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/03031853.2013.798064

Mates, D., Grosu, V., Hlaciuc, E., Bostan, I., Bunget, O., Domil, A., Moraru, M., & Artene, A. (2015). Biological assets and the agricultural products in the context of the implementation of the IAS 41: A case study of the Romanian agro-food system. Archives of Biological Sciences, 67(2), 705–714. https://doi.org/10.2298/ABS140301042M

Maurits, F., Harnawati, E., & Wijaya, S. Y. (2021). Accounting treatment analysis of agricultural activities in presenting financial statements based on PSAK 69 IN PT IJ. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478), 10(4), 255–263. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v10i4.1227

Maxwell, J. A., & Reybold, L. E. (2015). Qualitative Research. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition, 29(30), 685–689. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.10558-6

Meilansari, A. Y., Maslichah, & Mawardi, M. C. (2019). Evaluasi Penerapan PSAK-69 Agrikultur terhadap Aset Biologis (Studi pada Perusahaan Perkebunan Pertanian yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia tahun 2012-2017). E-Jra, 8(4), 1–14.

Murray, L. T., McCormack, J., Grobeiu, I., Wiklund, I., Kimel, M., & Van Nooten, F. (2020). Development of the neurotrophic keratopathy questionnaire: qualitative research. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 4(30), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-020-00192-y

Natasari, D., & Wulandari, R. (2018). Akuntansi Aset Biologis : Perlukah Adopsi International Public Sector Accounting Standard (IPSAS) 27 Dalam Standar Akuntansi Pemerintahan (SAP)? Jurnal Gama Societa, 1(1), 71–79.

Natasari, D., & Wulandari, R. (2019). Studi Kasus Perlakuan Akuntansi Aset Biologis Berdasarkan IPSAS 27 Agriculture Pada Dinas Pertanian X. Monex : Journal Research Accounting Politeknik Tegal, 8(1), 188–202. https://doi.org/10.30591/monex.v8i1.1097

Sayekti, Y., Irmadariyani, R., Agustini, A. T., & Supatmoko, D. (2018). The Implementation of Accounting Standards for Agriculture (PSAK 69): The Analysis of Companies’ Readiness. International Journal of Accounting and Taxation, 6(2), 23–28. https://doi.org/10.15640/ijat.v6n2a3

Scott, D., Wingard, C., & van Biljon, M. (2016). Challenges with the financial reporting of biological assets by public entities in South Africa. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 19(1), 139–149. https://doi.org/10.17159/2222-3436/2016/v19n1a9

Sitko, N. J., & Jayne, T. S. (2012). Why are African commodity exchanges languishing? A case study of the Zambian Agricultural Commodity Exchange. Food Policy, 37(3), 275–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.02.015

Suryahadi, A., Hadiwidjaja, G., & Sumarto, S. (2012). Economic growth and poverty reduction in Indonesia before and after the Asian financial crisis. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 48(2), 209–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2012.694155

Warsito, M. (2019). Pengakuan, Penilaian dan Pengungkapan “Aset” Satwa di Lembaga Konservasi. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 8(1), 1–13. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/accounting/article/view/25589

Xie, B., Liu, M., Randhi, T. O., & Yi, Y. (2020). Is the biological assets measured by historical cost value-related? Custos e Agronegocio, 16(1), 122–150.

Yin, R. K. (2016). Qualitative research from start to finish (second ed). Guilford publications.

Zulkarnain, A., & Fanani, Z. (2018). Studi Fenomenologis Kepatuhan Terhadap Standar Akuntansi Pemerintahan Dalam Pelaporan Aset Biologis (Studi Kasus: Organisasi “X”). AKTSAR: Jurnal Akuntansi Syariah, 1(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.21043/aktsar.v1i1.3818




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20961/jab.v22i1.788

Jurnal Akuntansi dan Bisnis (JAB)
ISSN 1412-0852 (print), 2580-5444 (online)
Published by Accounting Study Program, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia


Creative Commons License
JAB on http://jab.fe.uns.ac.id/index.php/jab is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Visitor Statistic