Liquidity Management, Corporate Investment, and Presidential Election

Taufiq Arifin, Payamta Payamta, Normaziah Mohd Nor

Abstract


This study analyzes whether election as a political event affect the liquidity management and investment decisions of Indonesian listed firms. Using presidential election as an uncertainty shock over 2010-2016 time period, we find that firms are more likely to increase their liquid assets and delay investment one year prior the election year. The precautional measure of holding more cash is that firms allocate more cash prior the election year to maintain financial flexibility because rising funds rendered transaction costs. However, we further find that firms reduce their liquidity and increase their investment during the election year. These results suggest that elections create political uncertainty and induce higher risk of extraction. Since cash, as well as other liquid assets, are the easiest resource to be grabbed by the politicians, firms have more incentives to hold less cash and therefore structure their liquid assets into hard assets to prevent such a risk.


Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pemilihan presiden sebagai salah satu event politik yang akan mempengaruhi manajemen likuiditas dan keputusan investasi perusahaan publik di Indonesia. Dengan menggunakan event pemilihan presiden sebagai uncertainty shock dengan periode sampel 2010-2016, kita menemukan bahwa perusahaan akan cenderung meningkatkan likuiditasnya dan menunda keputusan investasi setahun sebelum pemilihan presiden. Keputusan meningkatkan kas ini adalah bentuk strategi perusahaan untuk menjaga likuiditasnya dikarenakan adanya ketidakpastian di masa yang akan datang terkait dengan hasil dari pemilihan presiden. External financing di masa ketidakpastian akan menimbulkan kos transaksi yang lebih tinggi. Tetapi, bukti selanjutnya menunjukkan bahwa perusahaan akan mengurangi likuiditasnya dan meningkatkan investasi di tahun pemilihan presiden. Bukti empiris ini menunjukkan bahwa pemilihan presiden akan meningkatkan risiko political extraction. Dikarenakan kas, dan juga aset likuid lainnya, adalah bentuk sumberdaya yang mudah untuk dimanfaatkan oleh politisi, perusahaan akan memiliki motif yang lebih kuat untuk mengurangi aset likuidnya dan menggunakannya untuk investasi di aset fisik untuk menghindari risiko political extraction.    



Keywords


liquidity;investment;election

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arifin, T., & Purnomowati, N.H. (2017). Gov- ernment expenditure, political cycle & rent-seeking. International Journal of Business and Society, 18(3).

Arifin, T., Hasan, I., & Kabir, R. (2020). Transactional and relational ap- proaches to political connections and the cost of debt. Journal of Corporate Finance, 101768.

Baloria, V.P., & Klassen, K.J. (2018). Sup- porting tax policy change through accounting discretion: Evidence from the 2012 elections. Management Sci- ence, 64(10), 4893–4914.

Bernanke, B. S. (1983). Irreversibility, uncer- tainty, and cyclical investment. The quarterly journal of economics, 98(1), 85-106.

Bouoiyour, J., & Selmi, R. (2017). The price of political uncertainty: Evidence from the 2016 U.S. presidential elec- tion and the U.S. stock markets. Hal, 33(0), 1–27.

Caballero, Ricardo, & Robert P. (1996). In- vestment, Uncertainty and Industry Evolution. International Economic Review, 32, 641–662.

Caprio, L., Faccio, M., & McConnell, J.J. (2013). Sheltering corporate assets from political extraction. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 29(2), 332–354.

Carrière-Swallow, Y., & Céspedes, L.F. (2013). The impact of uncertainty shocks in emerging economies. Jour- nal of International Economics, 90(2), 316–325.

Chang, K., Kim, Y., Tomljanovich, M., & Ying, Y.H. (2013). Do political parties foster business cycles? An examina- tion of developed economies. Journal of Comparative Economics, 41(1), 212–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jce.2012.04.005

Chen, Y.S., Shen, C.H., & Lin, C.Y. (2014).

The benefits of political connection: Evidence from Individual Bank-Loan Contracts. Journal of Financial Ser- vices Research, 45(3), 287–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10693-013- 0167-1

Correia, M.M. (2014). Political connections and SEC enforcement. Journal of Ac- counting and Economics, 57(2–3), 241

–262.

Demski, J. S. (1988). Positive accounting theory: A review. Accounting, Organi- zations and Society, 13(6), 623-629.

Faccio, M., Masulis, R.W., & McConnell, J.J. (2006). Political connections and cor- porate bailouts. Journal of Finance, 61(6), 2597–2635.

Foremny, D., & Riedel, N. (2014). Business taxes and the electoral cycle. Journal of Public Economics, 115, 48–61. h t t p s : / / d o i . o r g / 1 0 . 1 0 1 6 / j.jpubeco.2014.04.005

Frye, T., & Shleifer, A. (1997). The invisible hand and the grabbing hand. The American Economic Review, 87(2), 3 5 4 – 3 5 8 . h t t p s : / / doi.org/10.2307/2950945

Fukuoka, Y. (2012). Politics, business and the state in Post-Soeharto Indonesia. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 34(1), 80–100.

Fukuoka, Y. (2013). Oligar- chy and democracy in post-suharto indonesia. Political Studies Review, 11 (1), 52–64.

Fung, S.Y.K., Gul, F.A., & Radhakrishnan, S. (2015). Corporate political connec- tions and the 2008 Malaysian elec- tion. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 43, 67–86.

Goldman, E., Rocholl, J., & So, J. (2013). Po- litically connected boards of direc- tors and the allocation of procure- ment contracts. Review of Finance, 17 (5), 1617–1648.

Goodell, J.W., & Bodey, R.A. (2012). Price- earnings changes during US presi- dential election cycles: Voter uncer- tainty and other determinants. Public Choice, 150(3–4), 633–650.

Goodell, J.W., & Vähämaa, S. (2013). US presidential elections and implied volatility: The role of political uncer- tainty. Journal of Banking and Fi- nance, 37(3), 1108–1117.

Habib, A., Muhammadi, A.H., & Jiang, H. (2017). Political connections and re- lated party transactions: Evidence from Indonesia. International Journal of Accounting, 52(1), 45–63.

He, Y., Lin, H., Wu, C., & Dufrene, U.B. (2009). The 2000 presidential elec- tion and the information cost of sen- sitive versus non-sensitive S&P 500 stocks. Journal of Financial Markets, 12(1), 54–86.

Houston, J.F., Jiang, L., Lin, C., & Ma, Y. (2014). Political connections and the cost of bank loans. Journal of Ac- counting Research, 52(1), 193–243.

Jens, C.E. (2017). Political uncertainty and investment: Causal evidence from U.S. gubernatorial elections. Journal of Financial Economics, 124(3), 563– 579.

Julio, B., & Yook, Y. (2012). Political uncer- tainty and coporate investment cycle. Journal of Finance, 67(1), 45–83.

Luebke, C. van. (2009). The political econo- my of local governance: Findings from an Indonesian field study. Bulle- tin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 45(2), 201–230.

Ozoguz, A. (2009). Good times or bad times? Investors' uncertainty and stock returns. The Review of Finan- cial Studies, 22(11), 4377-4422.

Ramanna, K., & Roychowdhury, S. (2010). Elections and discretionary accruals: Evidence from 2004. Journal of Ac- counting Research, 48(2), 445–475.

Shen, C.-H., & Lin, C.-Y. (2015). Betting on presidential elections: Should we buy stocks connected with the winning party? The Quarterly Review of Eco- nomics and Finance, 56, 98–109.

Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R.W. (1994). Politi- cians and Firms. The Quarterly Jour- nal of Economics, 109(4), 995–1025.

Spiller, P. T., & Savedoff, W. D. (1999). Com- mitment and Governance in Infra- structure. Can Privatization Deliver, 133-150.

Stulz, R.M. (2005). The limits of financial globalization. Journal of Finance, 60 (4), 1595–1638.

Voia, M.C., & Ferris, J.S. (2013). Do business cycle peaks predict election calls in Canada? European Journal of Political Economy, 29, 102–118.

Wang, Y., Chen, C.R., & Huang, Y.S. (2014). Economic policy uncertainty and cor- porate investment: Evidence from China. Pacific Basin Finance Journal, 26, 227–243.

Watts, R.L., & Zimmerman, J.L. (1978). To- wards a positive theory of determina- tion of accounting standards. Ac- counting Review, 53(1), 112–134.

Xu, N., Chen, Q., Xu, Y., & Chan, K.C. (2016).

Political uncertainty and cash hold- ings: Evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 40, 276–295.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20961/jab.v20i2.609

Jurnal Akuntansi dan Bisnis (JAB)
ISSN 1412-0852 (print), 2580-5444 (online)
Published by Accounting Study Program, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia


Creative Commons License
JAB on http://jab.fe.uns.ac.id/index.php/jab is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Visitor Statistic